Ram Narain Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59977 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2021 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAM NARAIN PASWAN Son of Rajendra Paswan Resident of Village - Chakaushan Govindpur, P.s.- Bidupur, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Mauli Chaurasia, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State and perused the case diary. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341 and 354(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. It is a case of outraging the modesty of the informant's daughter who is minor and when she went to go for natural call, the petitioner caught hold her and on make noise, the petitioner fled away from the place of occurrence. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner is next door neighbour of the informant and it is not possible of committing to such type of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59977 of 2021(3) dt.04-08-2022 2/2 act. He further submits that petitioner has clean antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail and submitted that during investigation, the witnesses have supported the case of the prosecution and also submitted that the processes of Section 82 and 83 have already been issued against this petitioner.

After considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail and the court below may consider his prayer for regular bail without being prejudiced by this order.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T