Shamshul Haque Ansari @ Shamshul Ansari v. State Of Bihar And ANR

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1660 of 2016 (2) dt.12-08-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1660 of 2016 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -140 Year- 2014 Thana -BARGANIA District- SITAMARHI =================================================== Shamshul Haque Ansari @ Shamshul Ansari, Son of Usman Ansari, Resident of village- Sekhauna, P.S Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Md. Osi Akhtar Ansari, son of Suleman Ansari, Resident of Village- Sekhauna, P.S Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. M.K. Nirala (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02.

12.08.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 27.03.2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in Bairgania P.S. Case No. 140 of 2014 (G.R. No. 2502 of 2014, Tr. No. 1832 of 2015) whereby and whereunder the court below has taken cognizance under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that certain statement made in the FIR itself discloses that it was not a case of Section 307 IPC but other sections are made out. Considering that there is no illegality in the order of cognizance, the application is dismissed.

Vikash/- (Shivaji Pandey, J.) U T