← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50745/2023bail granted

Santosh Kumar @ M/S Santosh Kumar @ Proprietor Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-19Mr. Justice Khatim Reza3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50745 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2020 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== Santosh Kumar @ M/S Santosh Kumar, Male, aged about 39 Yrs @ Proprietor Santosh Kumar S/O Chandeshwari Prasad Yadav R/O VillageBarharha Koni, P.S- Nimarli, Distt.- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mohit Shriwastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Supaul Town P.S. Case No. 101 of 2020 dated 13.02.2020, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 420 & 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that M/S Santosh Kumar entered into on agreement with Electricity Supply Division but on failure to fulfill the contract, it was canceled. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing criminal breach of trust by not providing the payment of "Manav Bal" after taking government money of Rs. 7,83,841/-. The same has not been paid by agency in the E.P.F. account of "Manav Bal"

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50745 of 2023(2) dt.19-08-2023 2/3 and monthly honorarium had also not been paid in the account of "Manav Bal" in spite of the same being paid by the electricity company to the agency. Petitioner is a proprietor of M/S Santosh Kumar @ proprietor Santosh Kumar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation against the petitioner is that he received Rs.7,83,841/- from the electricity company but the same was not deposited in the EPF account. Learned counsel further submits that total Rs.7,83,861/- has been deposited through Challan on different dates; lastly on 20th January, 2023, and Xerox copy of the Challan has been annexed as Annexure-2 series. It is further submitted that the petitioner has filed receipts of payment Challan before the Sessions Judge, Supaul in ABP No. 1533 of 2023 stating that all the payment of E.P.F. account has been paid by 20.01.2023. Lastly, it has been submitted that he has clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Supaul Town P.S.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50745 of 2023(2) dt.19-08-2023 3/3 Case No. 101 of 2020, he will be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Khatim Reza, J) annpurna/- U T