← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12176/2014dismissed

Shahnawaz Anwer v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-18Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12176 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Shahnawaz Anwer son of Md. Mustafa, Resident of Mohalla- Khatari, Police Station- Ara (Town), District- Bhojpur at Ara .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna through its Chairman.

3. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Bihar, Patna

4. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Bihar, Patna

5. The Joint Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Bihar, Patna

6. The Director, Bihar Tourism Department, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna

7. The Principal Secretary, Bihar Tourism Department, Old Secretariat, Patna

8. The Principal Secretary, Department of Vigilance, 4th Floor, Suchna Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna

9. Sri Kumar Madan son of Dashrath Yadav

10. Sri Pradip Kumar Yadav son of Indradev Yadav

11. Sri Sudhir Kumar son of Brij Nandan Pandit

12. Sri Rajesh Kumar Dinkar son of Bihari Ravi Das

13. Sri Birendra Kumar Singh son of Anirudh Singh

14. Sri Shohail Pervez son of Noor Muhammad

15. Sri Anil Kumar son of Anandi Pd. Yadav

16. Sri Shashi Prakash Gupta son of Radhey Prasad

17. Sri Surya Ketu Das son of Jantari Das

18. Sri Manmohan Kumar, Sl. No. 9 to 18 are 'Swagatak' (Receptionist) C/o the Director, Department of Tourism Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Durga Nand Jha Mr. Anamul Haque For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC9- RAJ NANDAN PD Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-03-2016 Writ application of the petitioner is dismissed because he does not seem to know the basic of arithmetic. A recalculation has been done. By no calculation and only by way of miscalculation can the total marks accrued to the petitioner be 64.72. Actual figure

Patna High Court CWJC No.12176 of 2014 dt.18-03-2016 worked out is in conformity with the stand taken by the respondent Commission. Even otherwise, the petitioner has agitated the same issue one to many times. The issue must rest now. Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U