← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2717/2014disposed

Maheshwar Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-07-13Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2717 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2923 of 2013 ====================================================== Maheshwar Prasad Singh, son of Late Sada Singh Resident of village - Sitalpur, P.S. Muffasil Munger, District - Munger .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Deepak Kumar Singh, Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. Mr. Gorakh, Director of Rehabilitation and Land Acquisition Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna .... .... O.P./s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Md. Khurshid Alam, Advocate.

For the O.P/s :

Mr. Purnendu Singh, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT 13-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Having regard to the fact that this Court had never issued any positive direction for promoting the petitioner and the limited direction in the connected writ application was only to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of benefit of A.C.P. and in compliance of the same the authorities have examined the matter and have come out with a reasoned order holding that the petitioner will not be entitled for grant of ACP on account of his not passing the departmental examination, there will be no need now to continue with the proceedings this contempt proceeding inasmuch as the opposite parties have complied the order of this Court in letter and spirit by passing a reasoned order.

Patna High Court MJC No.2717 of 2014 (2) dt.13-07-2015 2/2

3. Nonetheless, if the petitioner has some evidence to show that he had actually passed both the parts of the departmental examination, he can still approach the authorities to satisfy them that he was/is entitled for grant of ACP.

4.

With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of.

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U