← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17672/2021disposed

Binay Kumar Singh, v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-20Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17672 of 2021 ====================================================== Binay Kumar Singh, Son of Priyawart Narayan Singh @ Priwart Narayan Singh, Residing at Punama, Pratap Nagar, P.S.-Naugachia, District-Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur, District-Bhagalpur. 5.

The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Bhagalpur, District-Bhagalpur. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Sanhola, District-Bhagalpur. 7.

The Accountant General, Government of Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harish Chandra Patel, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kameshwar Prasad Gupta, ( Gp10 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 20-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State through virtual mode.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a retired employee from the post of Panchayat Secretary, Block Office, Sanhola, District - Bhagalpur w.e.f. 31.07.2019. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed several representations in which he has categorically taken the plea that marriage of his 2 daughters has to be solemnized. Counsel for the State seeks time to file the counter affidavit.

Patna High Court CWJC No. 17672 of 2021(2) dt.20-01-2023 2/2 In this background that no decision has taken place by the respondent no. 6, B.D.O., Sanhola, District - Bhagalpur who is the Administrative Officer for the petitioner, let it be directed to the respondent no. 6 and 7 to calculate the admissible post retiral dues of the petitioner within 6 weeks from the date of filing the representation and respondent no. 7 shall issue P.P.O. within 4 weeks thereafter. Payment shall be assured in the account of the petitioner, 1 week thereafter. In case of nonpayment of the admissible dues, 9 % interest shall be charged thereafter and the said amount shall be released from the pocket of respondent no. 6.

With the aforesaid direction, the writ application stands disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) sadique/- U