Babloo Malick @ Bablu Mallick @ Bablu Malik v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49452 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2025 Thana- Marnga District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Babloo Malick @ Bablu Mallick @ Bablu Malik Son of Late Mouli Malick Resident of Satkodaria PS -Maranga District- Purnea 2.

Pawan Malick @ Pawan Mallick son of Late Dinesh Malick villageMaranga, Dist- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Md Fazle Karim, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Maranga PS Case No. 153 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 177 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from Tractor and there is also recovery of motorcycle bearing Regd No. BR11BC-1407. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49452 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 2/2 submitted that tractor and motorcycle do not belong to the petitioners. It is further submitted that petitioner no. 1 disclosed the name of petitioner no. 2. The petitioner no. 1 is in custody since 06.05.2025 and petitioner no. 2 is in custody since 08.05.2025. Petitioner no. 1 has no criminal antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 7.

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Maranga PS Case No. 153 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T