Shyamala Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47968 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2022 Thana- BITHAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== Shyamala Devi wife of Raj Kumar Mukhiya Village- Malsar PS- Bithan District -Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Bithan P.S. Case No. 182 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 376(D), 302, 120(B), 34 of the IPC.

3. As per prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against three named accused persons, including the present petitioner. It has been alleged in the F.I.R. that one of the named accused persons, namely Ranvir Mukhia, made an indecent video of the sister of the informant. Thereafter, the petitioner, along with other co-accused persons, murdered the sister of the informant.

4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the allegation of committing rape and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47968 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 preparing videograph is against co-accused Ranvir Mukhia and the petitioner is mother of Ranvir Mukhia, has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that, according to allegation, three accused persons administered poisonous substance to the deceased, but the chargesheet has been submitted under Section 307 of the IPC. So far as the other accused persons are concerned, the investigation is still pending.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Bithan P.S. Case No. 182 of 2022, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make herself available as and when required by the court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T