Jai Prakash Prasad And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court MJC No.2876 of 2017 (3) dt.03-01-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2876 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18372 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Jai Prakash Prasad, son of Late Hira Lal Prasad, resident of Village & PO- Islampur, District- Nalanda.

2. Upendra Prasad Singh, son of Late Ram Lakhan Singh, resident of Village- Hasanpur, PO- Kolawari, PS- Harnaut, District- Nalanda at Biharsharif.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Mr. S. Siddarth the Principal Secretary, Department of Industry, Bihar, Pana.

3. Mrs. Sujata Chaturvedi, the Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Saket Kumar, the Director, Handloom and Sericulture, Department of Industry, Bihar, Patna.

5. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, the Additional Director, Department of Industry, Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rakesh Ambashtha, AC to AAG-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 03-01-2018 None appears on behalf of the petitioners.

Mr. Rakesh Ambashtha, learned Assisting Counsel to the Additional Advocate General No.7 appears and refers to the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite parties to submit that paragraph 9 thereof would confirm that the order passed on the writ petition has been complied. There is no rejoinder to the statement made in paragraph 9 of the show cause which informs that the A.C.P. benefits of the petitioner has been restored.

In that view of the matter, the contempt application is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U