Ajit Mandal @ Itwari Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25025 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -82 Year- 2015 Thana -KOTWALI District- MUNGER ======================================================

1. Ajit Mandal @ Itwari Mandal Son of Barun Mandal resident of Village - Akashi Kachahari Tola, P.S. - Bariyarpur, Distt - Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 07-10-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under section 302 of the I.P.C and section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, the son of the informant went to his hotel with his body guard and then he came to know that some miscreants have shot his son in hotel. He was being brought to the hospital but he succumbed to the injury on the bed of the hospital. Submission is that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. In the confessional statement of co-accused Golu @ Uttam and Sweety Mandal the name of the petitioner has come and that Golu @ Uttam has already been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25025 of 2015 (3) dt.07-10-2015 2/2 41545 of 2015 by order dated 10.09.2015 by another Bench of this Court and further Gobinda Mandal @ Givind Kumar has been allowed pre-arrest bail by order dated 24.09.2015 vide Cr. Misc. No. 26900 of 2015.

The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that the name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner is also directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Munger in Kotwali P.S. Case No. 82 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T