Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60011/2023allowed

Kailu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-21Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60011 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2021 Thana- SARMERA District- Nalanda ====================================================== KAILU YADAV Son of Late Doman Yadav Resident of Village-Bari Malavan, Police Station-Sarmera, District-Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Samir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 21-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the sister and sister's son of the informant due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. He submitted that the petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased. He submitted that the petitioner has no concern with mess and business of the deceased as well as her husband and also he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60011 of 2023(3) dt.21-09-2023 2/2 lives separately from them. He is languishing in judicial custody since 01.09.2021.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 163 of 2021.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U