Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14995/2014disposed

Ranjeet Raut @ Ranjeet Kumar Raut v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-03-03Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14995 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -947 Year- 2013 Thana -NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE DistrictNAWADA ====================================================== Ranjeet Raut @ Ranjeet Kumar Raut Son Of Shrawan Raut Resident Of Village Chulhai Milki, P.S. - Warisaliganj, District - Nawada, At Present Residing At Village - Balwapar, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District - Nawada. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Neelam Devi Wife Of Ranjeet Raut, D/O Arjun Raut, Residing At Village - Adampur, P.S. Roh, District- Nawada. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dr.Kr.Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 03-03-2016 Heard the parties.

A joint petition for compromise has been filed stating that the parties have compromised the case outside the Court and they are not ready to continue with the matrimonial life. They have also agreed to settle the matter on payment of Rs. 1,00,000/-(rupees one lac) as one time settlement. It has been stated that they will start their lives separately and there will be no relation between them. Opposite party no. 2 has agreed to withdraw the case concerned.

In above view of the matter, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner is extended for further four weeks.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14995 of 2014 (10) dt.03-03-2016 In the meantime, the petitioner will deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- (rupees one lac) before the court below on 30th of March, 2016. Thereafter, the opposite party no. 2 would be at liberty to withdraw the same. After deposit of the money by the petitioner, the court below would pass order making the provisional bail granted to him absolute.

Parties will be at liberty to file application for withdrawal of the case concerned which would be considered by the court below in accordance with law. They would also be at liberty to file a case for divorce on mutual consent which should be disposed of by the court concerned in accordance with law. This application is, thus, disposed of.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U T