Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48875/2015bail granted

Ladu Singh @ Amresh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-01-28Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48875 of 2015 (3) dt.28-01-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48875 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 2015 Thana -TANDWA District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Ladu Singh @ Amresh Singh Son of Late Raj Kishore Singh, Resident of Village - Hadna, P.S. - Hussenabad (Jalpa), District - Palamu (Jharkhand).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Haque (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 27of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

The petitioner and the co-accused Danveer Singh were arrested and from possession of the petitioner one country made pistol was recovered.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has been made victim of circumstances, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he is suffering in custody since 28.06.2015.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48875 of 2015 (3) dt.28-01-2016 Learned APP submits that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent also.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the alleged recovery and period of detention, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 27 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T