Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21504/2018rejected

Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-04-11Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21504 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2014 Thana- BEUR District- Patna ====================================================== Chandan Kumar , son of Shir Vijay Kumar yadav, resident of villageMakhdumpur, P.O.+P.S.-Beur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 11-04-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier thrice rejected vide order dated 16.10.2015, 22.06.2016 and 30.08.2017, passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 28267 of 2014, 21516 of 2016 and 41491 of 2017, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 08.07.2014 and up till now no prosecution witness has been examined, though there was direction to conclude the trial within 6 months.

Learned APP submits that the petitioner is the assailant.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, at this

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21504 of 2018(2) dt.11-04-2018 2/2 stage, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of bail of the petitioner, again his such prayer stands rejected in connection with Sessions Trial No. 534/2015 arising out of Beur P.S . Case No. 131 of 2014 pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge-X, Patna.

However, considering the period of detention of the petitioner, the trial court is again directed to expedite the trial and to conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within four month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order after taking the same on priority basis, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Banti/- U T