Arundev Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7970 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2019 Thana- BARHARA KOTHI District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
ARUNDEV MANDAL Son of Late Bhujangi Mandal Resident of Village - Sukhsena, Tarariya Tola, P.S.- Barhara, District - Purnea 2.
Binit Kumar Mandal Son of Late Bhujangi Mandal Resident of Village - Sukhsena, Tarariya Tola, P.S.- Barhara, District - Purnea 3.
Niranjan Mandal Son of Late Bhujangi Mandal Resident of Village - Sukhsena, Tarariya Tola, P.S.- Barhara, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dr. Bidhu Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 224, 225, 332, 333, 353, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is a case of creating hindrance in discharging the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7970 of 2021(3) dt.11-01-2022 2/2 official duties when the police officials went to arrest the accused persons.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. He further submits that it is not clear that who were injured in the present case.
Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
From perusal of the case, that there is no allegation against the petitioners.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 218 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U