Shambhu Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Home Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1063 of 2015 ====================================================== Shambhu Prasad S/o Baiju Prasad, resident of Amlapatti, P.S.- Motihari Town, Dist.- East Champaran .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Home Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna
3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur, Bihar
4. The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran
5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Motihari, East Champaran
6. The S.H.o., Motihari Town Police Station
7. The Investigating Officer/S.I. in Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 218 of 2014, Motihari, East Champaran
8. Shri Dharamveer Mahto, the then Investigating Officer/S.I. in Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 218 of 2014, posted at Motihari Town P.S., Motihari, East Champaran.
9. Rambabu Prasad S/o Late Rajendra Prasad, resident of Panchmandir Chowk, Bisati Patti, P.S.- Motihari Town, Dist.- East Champaran .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vindhyachal Singh, Advocate Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Syed Arshad Alam, S. C.-3. Mr. Mahtab Alam, A. C. to S.C.-3.
For the Informant : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-11-2015 By way of an application filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 17.06.2015 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champran by which he has rejected the
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1063 of 2015 (3) dt.30-11-2015 2/2 report of the Superintendent of Police submitted under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Motihari (Town) P. S. Case No. 218 of 2014.
After pressing the application at length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this application in order to raise all the points available to the petitioner at the stage of framing of charge.
Leave is granted.
The application is disposed of.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Kanchan/- U T