Mahendra Bhuyian v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2194 of 2017 ====================================================== Mahendra Bhuyian Son of late Lemu Bhuyian @ Lemu Manjhi Resident of Morama, P.O. Pataner, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Director, Bihar Shiksha Pariyojana Parishad, Patna.

2. The Director, Shiksa Pariyojana Parishad, Patna.

3. The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

4. The District Programme Officer( Sakshrata) Lakhisarai.

5. The District Education Officer, Lakhisarai.

6. The District Secretary, Bihar Zila Lok Shiksha Samiti, Lakhisarai.

7. The Block Secretary, Bihar Block Lok Shiksha Samiti Lakhisarai.

8. The Head Master, Utkramit Madhya Vidyalaya, Morama District Lakhisarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Om Prakash Maharaj, Advocate For the State :

Mr. S.K.Ranjan, AC to GP17 For Resp. BEPC :

Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 04-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The writ application involves serious disputed question of fact and as such the writ court is not inclined to adjudicate the dispute involved in the present proceeding.

Considering the nature of dispute where the respondents have seriously disputed the claim of the petitioner, the court is not inclined to issue any positive direction. However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to approach the respondentauthorities for redressal of his grievances. In case the petitioner represents before the respondent-authorities, namely, the

Patna High Court CWJC No.2194 of 2017(2) dt.04-12-2017 2/2 respondent no.4, he will look into the grievance on perusal of the representation and on the basis of the recorded available and if he finds substance in the claim of the petitioner, he shall pass positive order for payment. In the event he does not find any merit in the claim of the petitioner, he shall pass speaking order for rejecting the claim of the petitioner. The respondents shall dispose of the matter expeditiously preferably within a period of six months.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U