Vikash Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31238 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -59 Year- 2014 Thana -KHISARSARAI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar, Son of Arvind Singh

2. Chiku Kumar, Son of Arvind Singh.

Both resident of village- Maksudpur, P.S.- Khizersarai, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 20-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307/34 of IPC and 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioners is to have shot fire which caused injury to the informant.

It is submitted that on the occasion of marriage some dispute arose amongst Barati Party, Sarati Party and other party. Later on, there is amicable settlement between both the parties and the informant has filed a petition for compromise stating therein that he could not identify the person, who had fired. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31238 of 2014 (2) dt.20-01-2015 2/2 criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances, in case of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks the above named petitioners will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Khizersarai P. S. Case No. 59 of 2014, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the other following conditions:-

1. The petitioners will not indulge themselves in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioners.

3. The petitioners will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, their bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T