Raghuvansh Narain Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Amit Meena, Principal Secretary, Co- Operative Department, Governmen
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.283 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7255 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Raghuvansh Narain Singh Son of Late Ramphal Singh, resident of Village Vyas Chak (Chak Vyas) , Po and Ps Goraul, District- Vaishali
2. Shailendra Kumar Pandey son of Late Nawal Kishore Pandey REsident of Village + P.O. Akhtiyarpur, P. S. - Rai , District- Vaishali
3. Krishna Deo Dingh son of Late Narain Singh resident of Village+ Po Chak Shingar, PS. Judawanpur, district- Vaishali
4. Sudhi Ranjan Prasad son of Shri Narain Prasad Mishra resident of village chand sarai, PS Mahua, District- Vaishali
5. Jag Lal Paswan son of Shri Raghu Paswan resident of Village Goraul , PS Mahua, District- Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through Sri Amit Meena, Principal Secretary, CoOperative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. Sri Narendra Prasad Mandal The Registrar , Co Operative Societies, Bihar, Patna null null
3. Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar The Vaishali District Central Co Operative Bank Ltd. Hajipur Through its Managing Director
4. Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar The Managing Director , The Vaishali District Central Co Operative Bank Ltd. Hajipur
5. Sri Bisundeo Rai, Chairman, The Vaishali District Central Co Operative Bank Ltd. Hajipur
6. Sri Akhilesh Kumar , The Public Relation Officer, Co Operative Societies , Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Meeta Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL
Patna High Court MJC No.283 of 2017 (2) dt.29-03-2018 2/2 ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) 29-03-2018 Counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the contempt application since it has become infructuous. Contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Devendra/Arjun U