Arjun Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50311 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -261 Year- 2014 Thana -MAKHDUMPUR District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Arjun Manjhi S/o Maheshi Manjhi resident of village - Sumera, P.S. Makhdumpur, Distt. - Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 05-04-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned A.P.P for the State as also the learned counsel for the Informant.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 376, 511 and 34 of the I.P.C Allegedly, the petitioner tried to commit rape with the informant and further bite her on the left side of her waist but due to the alarm being raised and assemblance of father, mother and aunt of the informant she was saved.

Submission is of false implication and that he is a married man, there was some altercation resulting the informant lodged this false case, the petitioner is suffering in custody since 29.04.2015 and have been sufficiently penalized, to which the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50311 of 2015 (3) dt.05-04-2016 2/2 learned A.P.P. duly assisted by the learned counsel for the informant opposes prayer for bail by submitting that the injury found on the person of the informant supports the allegation. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering detention of the petitioner, now he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Jehanabad in Makhdumpur (Tehta) P.S. Case No. 261 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T