Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17091/2018bail granted

Seema Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-03-28Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17091 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -503 Year- 2017 Thana -MASAURHI District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Seema Devi, Wife of Satendra Paswan.

2. Satendra Paswan, Son of Late Binod Paswan. Both are Resident of Village- Kharant, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ataur Rahman, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 503 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are Gotni and Bhainsur of the deceased. In the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17091 of 2018 (2) dt.28-03-2018 2/2 No. 503 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ranjay Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Masaurhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bond and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T