Ankit Kumar @ Nanhak Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48653 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2025 Thana- SHAHPUR PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ankit Kumar @ Nanhak Ray S/o Butli Ray @ Butali Ray R/o village - Chakarman , Police Station - Shahpur Patori , District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahendra Pratap, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State Mr. Ravindra Kumar.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.S.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young boy aged about 22 years and the informant alleges that while he was returning home when he was intercepted by the accused persons along with unknown accused and Bigul assaulted him by sword causing injury on leg and also assaulted indiscriminately on his leg, while Ankit assaulted by farsha causing injury on head, thereafter Munna who was carrying pistol took his chain.

4. The learned counsel submits that petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48653 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant who is Ward member and acted inappropriately with wife of Bigul which led to an altercation in which both side assaulted each other. It is also submitted that though it is alleged that petitioner assaulted the informant by farsha causing injury on head but then from perusal of the injury report annexed as Annexure-2, it would manifest that injury is simple but then it is submitted that petitioner did not assault the informant rather he fell and received injury. It is also submitted that petitioner is not a criminal and is a young boy and in the event if he is sent to judicial custody his entire career would get jeopardized and chances are bright that he may come in contact with hardened criminal.

It is next submitted that date of occurrence is 15.03.2025 and the FIR came to be instituted on 17.03.2025. It is further submitted that though it is alleged that accused persons assaulted the informant but then from perusal of the injury report, it would manifest that injured suffered only one injury caused by blunt substance.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48653 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Shahpur Patori P.S. Case No.101/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T