Nand Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.84 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- MADHUBANI ===========================================================

1. Nand Kumar Jha, son of Sri Yogendra Narayan Jha, resident of Village + Post Office- Harai, Police Station- Rudrapur, Via- Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga.

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga.

5. The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

6. The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.

7. The S.H.O. Rudrapur Police Station, District- Madhubani.

8. Anandi Devi, wife of Late Khushi Nath Jha.

9. Santosh Kumar Jha, son of Late Khushi Nath Jha.

10. Sunil Kumar Jha (Bachwa), son of Late Khushi Nath Jha.

11. Dipak Kumar Jha (Chhotan) son of Late Khushi Nath Jha.

12. Sudhanshu Kumar Jha (Sajjan), son of Late Khushi Nath Jha.

13. Anil Kumar Jha @ Guriya, son of Late Khushi Nath Jha. Respondent No. 8 to 13 are resident of Village- Harari, Police Station Rudrapur, District- Madhubani. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheojee Mishra. For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Dr.)Md. Raisul Haque, S.C. 4. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-03-2016 The petitioner has sought a direction to the respondent authorities to protect life and property of his old parents who are suffering physical torture and mental agony at the hands of the private respondents.

A perusal of the writ petition shows that the private respondents are agnates of the parents of the present petitioner. Inter se dispute with regard to the property between the parties cannot be

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.84 of 2016 dt.02-03-2016 resolved in the present writ petition in the garb of threat to life and property of senior citizens.

If the petitioner has any grievance against the private respondents, he is at liberty to seek appropriate alternative remedy as may be available to him in accordance with law but no direction is called for by this Court in the present writ petition. This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (Hemant Gupta, J) Amin/- U