Shubhan @ Subhan @ Md. Subhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30632 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -233 Year- 2009 Thana -FORBESGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Shubhan @ Subhan @ Md. Subhan, son of Khatru, resident of villageTappu Tola Pipra Ghat, P.S. Jogbani, District Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.K.Nirala(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. One co-accused, Md. Sajjad was caught by the villagers just after the alleged occurrence and the aforesaid coaccused, Md. Sajjad disclosed the name of his associates including the petitioner. No doubt, petitioner carries criminal antecedent of near about 15 cases but in the present case, except the aforesaid extra judicial confession, there appears to be nothing against him. It is pointed out on behalf of the petitioner that having more or less similar allegation, several co-accused are enjoying the privilege of bail.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30632 of 2015 (4) dt.15-10-2015 2/2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Araria in connection with Sessions Trial No. 175 of 2014 arising out of Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 233 of 2009, subject to condition that petitioner shall give his attendance in first week of every month before the Officer in charge of Forbesganj Police Station for the period of one year or till conclusion of his trial, whichever is earlier and if he fails to do so, the concerned officer in charge shall send his report to the court concerned and in that event, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. The aforesaid condition shall apply in respect of the petitioner if he is released on bail in almost all the cases in which he has been made accused. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T