Manju Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17949 of 2021 ====================================================== Manju Das Wife of Late Dr. Ramesh Lal Das, Resident of Ward no 13 Piprahi Simrahi P.S. Raghopur and District Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar Patna. 2.
The District Magistrarte, Supaul.
3.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Supaul.
4.
The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 5.
The Deputy Inspector Genral of Police, Kosi Division, 6.
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Supaul.
7.
The Station House Officer, Raghopur Police Station. 8.
Ram Narayan Yadav S/o Late Rasik Lal Yadav Resident of Village-Sakin Fakirna, P.S. Karjaran and District Supaul.
9.
Binod Yadav S/o Late Rasik Lal Yadav Resident of Village Sakin Fakirna, P.S. Karjaran and District Supaul.
10.
The Superintendent of Police, Supaul.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Md. N.H. Khan (Sc1) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 24-11-2022 At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to add the Superintendent of Police, Supaul as party Respondent No. 10 to the present writ petition. Permission, so sought, is granted. The needful be done during the course of the day.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, who is
Patna High Court CWJC No.17949 of 2021(2) dt.24-11-2022 2/2 a widow, is being harassed by the local goons and she is apprehending threat to her life and property, hence, the Superintendent of Police, Supaul be directed to consider the representation to be made by the petitioner, before the newly added Respondent No. 10.
Having regard to the nature of grievance of the petitioner, I deem it fit and proper to grant liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate representation before the Respondent No. 10 within a period of two weeks from today, whereupon the Respondent No. 10 shall take needful action, forthwith.
The writ petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U