Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12051/2018bail granted

Bablu Goswami v. The State Of Bihar

2018-03-08Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12051 of 2018 (2) dt.08-03-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12051 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2018 Thana -NALANDA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Bablu Goswami S/o Late Ram Chandra Goswami @ Late Ram Chandra Gosai, R/o Village- Bargaon, P.S. and District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 08-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2018 in connection with Nalanda P.S. Case No. 07 of 2018 for the offences alleged under Sections 420, 379, 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion of carrying on money exchange with Bhutani tourists at Nalanda Khandhar, and no foreign tourist has lodged any complaint in this behalf. Similarly situated co-accused Chhotu Kumar has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 12282 of 2018.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12051 of 2018 (2) dt.08-03-2018 satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Nalanda P.S. Case No. 07 of 2018, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T