← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54335/2024allowed

Premnath Pandey @ Premanath Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2024-11-14Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54335 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2024 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

PREMNATH PANDEY @ PREMANATH PANDEY SON OF SRI RAM AYODHYA PANDEY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - PAKARI DIXIT, POST - MIRCHAIYA, P.S. - KALYANPUR, DISTRICT - EAST CHAMPARAN - 845412 2.

SUNITA DEVI WIFE OF SRI PREMNATH PANDEY @ PREMANATH PANDEY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - PAKARI DIXIT, POST - MIRCHAIYA, P.S. - KALYANPUR, DISTRICT - EAST CHAMPARAN - 845412 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 304(B) and 34 of the IPC. 3.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other accused persons have killed the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of a four wheeler vehicle. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to grudge. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54335 of 2024(3) dt.14-11-2024 2/2 The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioners are the fatherin-law and the mother-in-law of the deceased. It is submitted that the husband of the deceased has already surrendered before the learned Court below on 18.10.2024. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since husband of deceased is already in custody, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No.61 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T