← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14965/2019disposed

Arun Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-22Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14965 of 2019 ====================================================== Arun Kumar Singh Son of Motilal Singh, resident of Village- Jalalpur, P.O.- Dhubpokhar, Police Station- Karamchat (Sabar), District- Kaimur, at present posted as Incharge Head Master, Primary School, Lily, Anchal Rampur, District- Kaimur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Mid-Day Meal Scheme, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Kaimur, Bhabua.

4.

The District Education Officer, Kaimur at Bhabua. 5.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment (Education Department), Kaimur at Bhabua.

6.

The District Programme Officer, Mid- Day Meal Scheme, Kaimur at Bhabua.

7.

District Programme Manager, Mid-Day Meal, Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh For the State :

Ms. Namrata singh, AC to EX.G.A. 12 For the M.D.M.

:

Mr. Girijesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-12-2023

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned.

2. Learned Counsel for the State as well as learned Counsel appearing for the Mid Day Meal Scheme submit that the petitioners is the Head Masters of the Upgraded Middle School, Lilly, in the Rampur Circle, and has challenged the letter no. 2556, dated 30.11.2016, issued by the District Programme Officer, Establishment, Kaimur, at Bhabhua, directing him to deposit/refund the excess amount received by him for providing mid-day meal.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14965 of 2019(3) dt.22-12-2023 2/2

3. Learned Counsel for the Mid Day Meal submits that upon inspection by the District District Programme Officer, Mid-day Meal, Kaimur, it was found that the number of children were less than the attendance made by the petitioner.

4. Taking into consideration the nature of dispute, in my opinion, it is appropriate for the Director, Mid Day Meal, to hear both the parties and pass a final order upon the letter of recovery issued by the District Programme Officer, Establishment, Kaimur.

5. Accordingly, I direct the Director, Mid Day Meal, to fix a date for appearance of the petitioner and the respondent nos. 5 and 6 before him, for giving them personal hearing and deciding the matter by a reasoned order.

6. The entire exercise must be completed by the Director within a period of six months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.

7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ application is disposed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √