← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6570/2021bail rejected

Dugi Lal Yadav @ Durgi Lal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-11Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6570 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gaya ====================================================== Dugi Lal Yadav @ Durgi Lal Yadav Son of Ado Yadav Resident of VillageSabladih, P.S.- Bishnugarh, Distt- Hajaribag, Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar-I, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 56B of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. It is a case of recovery of about 400 liters of country made Mahua from the vehicle of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid facts, the aforesaid liquor

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6570 of 2021(6) dt.11-05-2022 2/2 was recovered from the vehicle of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T