Ajay Mehta v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60272 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2021 Thana- AMBA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.
Ajay Mehta Son of Chanarik Mahto Resident of Village - Deura Tola ( Simrahua), P.S. - Amba, Dist. - Aurangabad. 2.
Bilash Mehta @ Bilash Mahto Son of Chanarik Mahto Resident of Village - Deura Tola ( Simrahua), P.S. - Amba, Dist. - Aurangabad. 3.
Arjun Mehta Son of Late Mungeshwar Mehta Resident of Village - Deura Tola ( Simrahua), P.S. - Amba, Dist. - Aurangabad. 4.
Mritunjay Mehta @ Mritunjay Kumar Son of Arjun Mehta Resident of Village - Deura Tola ( Simrahua), P.S. - Amba, Dist. - Aurangabad. 5.
Ravindra Mehta @ Ravindra Kumar Son of Krishna Mehta Resident of Village - Deura Tola ( Simrahua), P.S. - Amba, Dist. - Aurangabad. 6.
Krishna Mehta @ Krishna Mahto Son of Baliram Mehta Resident of Village - Deura Tola ( Simrahua), P.S. - Amba, Dist. - Aurangabad. 7.
Binit Mehta @ Vinit Kumar Son of Bijay Mehta Resident of Village - Deura Tola ( Simrahua), P.S. - Amba, Dist. - Aurangabad. 8.
Anuj Mehta @ Anuj Kumar Son of Prabhu Mehta Resident of Village - Deura Tola ( Simrahua), P.S. - Amba, Dist. - Aurangabad. 9.
Sitaram Mahto Son of Not known Resident of Village - Deura Tola ( Simrahua), P.S. - Amba, Dist. - Aurangabad. 10.
Mohan Kumar Mehta @ Mohan Mehta Son of not Known Resident of Village - Deura Tola ( Simrahua), P.S. - Amba, Dist. - Aurangabad. 11.
Dilip Mehta @ Dilip Kumar Son of Binod Mehta Resident of Village - Deura Tola ( Simrahua), P.S. - Amba, Dist. - Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60272 of 2021(2) dt.11-05-2022 2/3 to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 325, 354(B), 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is alleged that all the F.I.R named accused persons including the petitioners variously armed assaulted the informant and others.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are co-villagers and for a petty dispute, the accusation has been levelled against the petitioners. There is counter version of the occurrence also. Moreover, the injuries have been found to be simple in nature. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60272 of 2021(2) dt.11-05-2022 3/3 In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Amba P.S. Case No. 40 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T