← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1823/2016dismissed

Dr. Lakshmikant Sahay v. The Magadh University And ORS

2016-04-25Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1823 of 2016 =========================================================== Dr. Lakshmikant Sahay Son of Late Deodhari Lal, Retired University Professor of Ranchi University, resident of Mohalla - Bairagi, P.S. Delha, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Distt. Gaya through its Registrar

2. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Distt. Gaya

3. The Pro Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Distt. Gaya

4. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Distt. Gaya

5. Inspector of the College (Arts & Commerce) Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Distt. Gaya

6. Dr. Parshuram Mishra, the President, Governing Body of the Sanjay Gandhi Mahila College, Bairagi, Gaya, Distt. - Gaya

7. Dr. Gagan Kumar, the Secretary, Sanjay Gandhi Mahila College, Bairagi, Gaya, Distt. - Gaya

8. Smt. Sweta Kumari, the Principal, Sanjay Gandhi Mahila College, Bairagi, Gaya, Distt. - Gaya .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Onkar Kumar, Advocate For M.U.

:

Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-04-2016 Petitioner has filed the writ application for a direction upon the Magadh University to constitute a regular governing body what is known as Sanjay Gandhi Mahila College at Bairagi in the district of Gaya. When the Court put a question to the petitioner as to what interest he has with the institution in question or what is his relationship with the institution in question if not what is his status to demand such a relief, no clear answer is coming in this regard nor anything has been pleaded in the writ application on this

Patna High Court CWJC No.1823 of 2016 dt.25-04-2016 2 / 2 aspect of the matter.

Court is not willing to entertain writ applications of busy bodies.

Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SanjayKumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 26.04.2016 Transmission Date