Patna High CourtCWJC/13254/2014disposed

Janki Devi And ORS v. Raja Ram Mahto And ANR

2016-09-22Mr. Justice V. Nath2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13254 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Janki Devi wife of late Muni Lal Mahto

2. Baijnath Singh.

3. Jagarnath Singh. Both sons of late Muni Lal Mahto.

4. Dhanwa Devi

5. Sunaina Devi Both daughters of late Munilal Mahto

6. Nirmala Devi wife of Ram Bahadur Das All resident of Village - Chiranjeepur, Tole - Chakka, Pragna - Naipur, P.O. - Fatehpur, P.S. AND Anchal - Bachhwara, Sub-Division AND Sub-Registry - Teghra, District - Begusarai.

7. Ganga Singh @ Ganga Prasad Singh son of Saryug Singh

8. Babu Prasad Singh son of Dore Singh Both resident of Village - Chiranjeepur, Tole - Chakka, Pragna - Naipur, P.O. - Fatehpur, P.S. AND Anchal - Bachhwara, Sub-Division AND Sub-Registry - Teghra, District - Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Raja Ram Mahto son of late Chamru Mahto.

2. Most. Ram Dulari Devi wife of late Chamru Mahto Both resident of Village - Chiranjeepur, Tole - Chakka, Pragna - Naipur, P.O. - Fatehpur, P.S. AND Anchal - Bachhwara, Sub-Division AND Sub-Registry - Teghra, District - Begusarai. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 22-09-2016 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has confined his prayer for grant of liberty to file additional written statement in view of the prayer made for

Patna High Court CWJC No.13254 of 2014 dt.22-09-2016 amendment in the plaint which has been allowed by the court below. This Court finds from the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners that the opportunity has been allowed to the petitioners to file additional written statement in the order by which the prayer for amendment of the plaint has been allowed.

It goes without saying that the defendant-petitioners would be at liberty to file additional written statement, if not filed already in the view of the amendment made in the plaint. The application is, accordingly, disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

(V. Nath, J) Ranjan/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date