← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59730/2021allowed

Anmol Jaiswal @ Anmol Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-12Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59730 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-553 Year-2020 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ====================================================== ANMOL JAISWAL @ ANMOL KUMAR S/O KRISHNA PRASAD JAISWAL @ KRISHNA PRASAD R/o Mohalla- Gandhinagar, Kalwar Patti, P.S.- Chanpatia, District- West Champaran. Also resident of Pragati Nagar, Ujjain Tola, P.S.- Bettiah Town, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jagjit Roshan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-07-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 406, 420, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Bettiah Town P.S.Case No. 553 of 2020 (G.R.No. 4216 of 2020). The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that FIR shows that co-accused Krishna Prasad Jaiswal, the father of the petitioner, took money from the informant to whom

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59730 of 2021(2) dt.12-07-2022 2/3 co-accused Manoj Prasad Jaiswal introduced with the informant. The petitioner has no role in that transaction. He has submitted further that the bank account no. 1017000299202, as mentioned in the FIR, is not in the name of the present petitioner. The allegation against co-accused Manoj Prasad Jaiswal @ Manoj Kumar is that he introduced the informant with co-accused Krishna Prasad Jaiswal and he has been granted regular bail. He has also submitted that co-accused Pratima Devi and Suman Kumari @ Suman, on similar allegation, have been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr.Misc. No. 39710 of 2021 and Cr.Misc. No. 39545 of 2021 respectively.

Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Town P.S.Case No. 553 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59730 of 2021(2) dt.12-07-2022 3/3 the petitioner within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T