Rajendra Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49852 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2026 Thana- SRINAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== RAJENDRA MAHTO Son of Late Kamal Mahto Resident of Village- Kohara Musahari tola, P.S.- Srinagar, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sarvesh Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-07-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that that on 12-5-2026 at 9 pm, he was waiting near his JCB for his driver when accused persons, i.e., his agnates including the petitioner came and stated abusing, on objection Sanjay gave orders to kill, thereafter petitioner caught him from behind and Sant Kumar assaulted him by rod causing injury on head and Sanjay snatched his chain.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49852 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to property. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of assaulting the informant by rod causing injury on head is against Sant Kumar and as far as the petitioner is concerned, the allegation against him is ornamental of holding the petitioner.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Srinagar P.S. Case No. 127 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T