Munna Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51417 of 2015 ====================================================== Munna Roy son of Ram Ishwar Roy Resident of village Guljarpur P.S. Sahar, District Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhavesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Iftekhar Mahmood(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 08-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No. 81 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, the petitioner and co-accused Kallu Mushar opened fire which hit the thigh of the informant and also in the leg of Tismar Paswan.

Submission is of false implication and that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are general and omnibus, it is not alleged that the petitioner repeated the firing, no injury has been caused on the vital part of the injured and the petitioner who

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51417 of 2015 (4) dt.08-02-2016 2/2 is suffering in custody since 22.08.2015 and now has been sufficiently penalized to which the learned APP opposes. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail after completion of nine months in custody from the date of his remand on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No. 81 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T