Sumant Kumar Singh @ Sumant Kumar @ Chhote Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24661 of 2018 (2) dt.27-04-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24661 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -215 Year- 2017 Thana -BHAGWANPUR District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Sumant Kumar Singh @ Sumant Kumar @ Chhote Singh, Son of Jagarnath Singh, Resident of Village- Palidih, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, DistrictBegusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 27-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2018 in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 215 of 2017 for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 326, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event the petitioner is said to be only the order giver and no assault has been attributed to him. The petitioner is made accused in one case prior to the present one which is of different nature.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 215 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24661 of 2018 (2) dt.27-04-2018 petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T