← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50245/2023allowed

Ranju Devi @ Ranju Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-12Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50245 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2023 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== Ranju Devi @ Ranju Kumari W/O Sanjiv Kumar @ Tunnu Mahto R/O Village- Farha (PHARHA), Ps. Nemdarganj, Dist. Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a commission of kidnapping and murder of the husband of the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and she has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and during the course of investigation, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50245 of 2023(3) dt.12-09-2023 2/3 petitioner has been roped in the present case. During investigation also, no consistent material evidence was collected against the petitioner to connect the petitioner with the present case and only on the basis of self confession before the police, which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law, nothing has been found against the petitioner. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 13.05.2023. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. In contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that on call made by the petitioner.

Considering the facts aforesaid and the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50245 of 2023(3) dt.12-09-2023 3/3 Class, Nawada in connection with Sirdala P.S. Case No. 167 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T