Abhimanu Kumar @ Chotu @ Abhimanyu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6716 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-434 Year-2020 Thana- HAJIPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== ABHIMANU KUMAR @ CHOTU @ ABHIMANYU KUMAR SON OF AJAY PATEL Resident of Village - Dighikala Purbi Maliya, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravish Mishra, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 28-07-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.
The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case no.434 of 2020 registered under sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code, sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and sections 20,22, 23, 24, 27, 27A and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. As per allegations in the F.I.R., 250 gms. of charas was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 5.7.2020. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6716 of 2021(3) dt.28-07-2021 2/2 investigation in the case has concluded.
The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
A report was called for with respect to the antecedent of the petitioner. As per the report received contained in letter dated 4.5.2021, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the recovery of 250 gms. of charas from the petitioner's possession, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T