Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5807 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-352 Year-2020 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Singh Son of Late Dinesh Singh Resident of Village - Salempur Pokhara, P.S.- Bikramganj, District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-04-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act, 2018.
Allegation is recovery of 254.16 litres foreign liquor from a Tata Sumo and petitioner and other accused were found unloading the liquor from the said vehicle and on seeing police tried to flee away but were apprehended after chase. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. It is further submitted that nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has nothing to do with the alleged recovered liquor. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 16.08.2020.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5807 of 2021(2) dt.15-04-2021 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No.352 of 2020 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.
(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T