Balle @ Md. Balle @ Md Suhel v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48042 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2024 Thana- VISHNUPAD District- Gaya ====================================================== Balle @ Md. Balle @ Md Suhel S/o- Late Md. Imteyaz Village- Koeribari Khajanchi Gali Nadranganj PS- Civil Line Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vijay Kumar For the State :
Ms. Renuka Ratnakar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-08-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. This is an application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-B)A, 26, 37 and 35 of the Arms Act, registered in connection with Vishnupad P.S.Case No. 146 of 2024.
3. According to the prosecution case, the informant got secret information that some miscreants had assembled with fire-arms for committing crime. Upon receiving information, acting swiftly, the informant along with other police personnel, rushed to the place of occurrence. Having seen the police team, the miscreants fired due to which one boy sustained injury.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48042 of 2025(3) dt.29-08-2025 2/2 submitted the petitioner was not arrested at the spot. Nothing was recovered from his possession and the villagers disclosed the name of the petitioner and other accused persons to the police, on the basis whereof they were made accused. His further submission is that on similar footing Raja @ Raju Alam and Sudhir Kumar Sharma have been granted bail by this Court and the petitioner has remained in custody since 22.04.2025
5. Considering the above facts and circumstances and a series of criminal cases registered against him, this Court is not inclined to exercise its discretion by granting bail to the petitioner.
6. The application is accordingly rejected.
7. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the court below itself after three months. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T