Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50209 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-277 Year-2020 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kumar Singh S/O Ramsebak Singh @ Ram Shevak Singh @ Shewak Singh Resident Of Village- Khan Gaown (East), P.S.- Pandaul, District- Madhubani.

2.

Rajan Singh S/O Ramsebak Singh @ Ram Shevak Singh @ Shewak Singh Resident Of Village- Khan Gaown (East), P.S.- Pandaul, DistrictMadhubani. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-01-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable u/s 448, 341, 323, 307, 354, 504 and 379 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with the co-accused persons abused and assaulted the informant and her family members. The petitioner No. 1 snatched a golden chain from the daughter of the informant and assaulted her with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50209 of 2022(2) dt.03-01-2023 2/2 lathi. The petitioner No. 2 also assaulted with an iron rod. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The members of the informant's family were not examined and no injury report was available in the case dairy. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioners. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Madhubani, in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No. 277 of 2020, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T