Pintu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5709 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2020 Thana- BUNIYAD GANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Pintu Yadav Son of RaKrishna Yadav, resident of Village-Dali Bigha, P.S.- Belaganj, District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-04-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act, 2018.

Allegation is recovery of 50 litres country-made liquor from the possession of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 22.11.2020.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, after completing six months in judicial

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5709 of 2021(2) dt.13-04-2021 2/2 custody, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No.179/20 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T