Md. Ijhar @ Sk. Ijhar And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33162 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2014 Thana -PIRPAINTI District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. MD. IJHAR @ SK. IJHAR SON OF LATE SK. NIYAMAT

2. MD. IMTIYAZ @ SK. IMTIYAZ SON OF SK. IJHAR BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - BANSAPTI, P.S.- KAHALGAON, DISTRICT - BHAGALPUR

3. MD. ISRAIL SON OF MD. SHAHID

4. MD. SADDAM SON OF MD. ISRAIL

5. MD. NAUSHAD @ MD. NAUSHAD ALAM SON OF MD. ISRAIEL

6. MD. AFSAR SON OF MD. ILIYAS

7. MD. BALA @ SK. BELAL SON OF MD. MOHABBAT

8. MD. SOBIYA @ SOBYA, SON OF MD. ALANUR

9. MD. HANDAL @ SK. ISMILE SON OF MD. SHAHID PETITIONER NO. 3 TO 9 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGEKHANPUR (RAJGANJ), P.S.-PIRPAINTI, DISTRICTBHAGALPUR.

.... .... PETITIONER/S

VERSUS

THE STATE OF BIHAR .... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 23-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

Taking into account the nature of allegation in consonance with the disclosure whereunder there happens to be fragrance of exercise of rights amongst the parties, it looks better to direct the petitioners to surrender before the learned lower court with a prayer for bail whereupon the learned lower court will consider favorably more particularly confining himself with regard to disclosure made by the informant himself that some sort of Patta was existing in favour of petitioners since before inconsonance with the allegation.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33162 of 2014 (4) dt.23-03-2015 With the aforesaid observation, instant petition is disposed of.

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) PN/- U