Bachcha Jee Choubey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18100 of 2019 ====================================================== Bachcha Jee Choubey, son of late Ayodhya Choubey, resident of villageBhopatpur, Choubey Tola, P.S.-Katwa, District-East Champaran (Motihari), Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary Home (Police) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna 4.

The Additional Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Phulwari Sharif, Patna (Bihar) 6.

The Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur (Ara)-cum-The Commandant, Mounted Military Police (MMP), Ara 7.

The Commandant, Mounted Military Police, Head Quarter, Bhojpur at Ara 8.

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna 9.

The Treasury Officer, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dr. Chandra Shekhar Azad For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad (Sc8) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 17-09-2019 The petitioner claims that though he was entitled to scale of Rs.4000-100-6000 with effect from 01.01.1996, he was wrongly allowed scale of Rs.3200-85-4900. He is accordingly seeking a direction to allow him the said scale of Rs.4000-6000 with effect from 01.01.1996.

2. The petitioner admittedly retired from service, from the post of Havildar in Mounted Military Police (MMP), Bihar,

Patna High Court CWJC No.18100 of 2019 dt.17-09-2019 2/2 with effect from 29.02.2012. It appears, as has been stated in paragraph-18 of the writ application that he had earlier approached this Court by filing a writ petition giving rise to CWJC No. 4045 of 2016 which was dismissed as withdrawn. There is no mention in the writ application as to whether any liberty was obtained for filing another writ application.

3. In such view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain this writ application because of inordinate delay and laches, in the absence of any justification at all, pleaded in the writ application.

4. This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) S.Ali/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 19/09/2019 Transmission Date NA.