← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2349/2016dismissed

Asharfi Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-11-01Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2349 of 2016 ====================================================== Asharfi Devi wife of Late Wakil Rai resident of Professors Colony, Lane No.2, Tajpur Road, Samastipur, P.O. Samastipur (G.P.O.), P.S.- Samastipur Town, District- Samastipur, (Bihar- 848101).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Vishweshwraiya Bhawan (Technical Secretariat), Opposite New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna- 800001.

2. The Chief Engineer, Tirhut Zone, Public Health Engineering Department, Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

3. The Superintending Engineer, Darbhanga Circle, Public Health Engineering Department, Darbhanga.

4. The Executive Engineer, Samastipur Division, Public Health Engineering Department, Samastipur.

5. The Assistant Engineer, Public Health Engineering Sub-Division, Samastipur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vijaya Laxmi Srivastva, A.C. to SC-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-11-2018 The learned counsel for the respondents submits that a sum of Rs. 82.33 lacs has already been paid to the husband of the petitioner against the executed work. However, so far as the claim of Rs.15 lacs an odd, involved in the present writ petition, is concerned, the same is not genuine in view of the agreement entered into between the parties. In fact letter dated 15.02.2016 was also issued to the petitioner to produce documents in support of her claim but no document has been produced till date, hence, the claim of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.2349 of 2016 (2) dt.01-11-2018 2/2 petitioner is not tenable.

In view of the stand taken by the respondents, there is no merit in the present petition, hence the same is dismissed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U