Guddu Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47936 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2015 Thana -BHOJPUR GRP CASE District- BHOJPUR =====================================

1. Guddu Pandey, Son of Lallan Pandey, Resident of VillageImadpur, P.S.- Imadpur, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ===================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Atul Chandra (A.P.P.) ===================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State. This application for grant of regular bail arises out of Ara G.R.P. Case No.12 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 399 of 402 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that acting on a secret information, police had conducted raid and arrested four persons, namely, Raja Sao, Anil Chaudhary, Pintu Sah and Santosh Rai. He submits that the petitioner's name

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47936 of 2015 (2) dt.09-11-2015 2/2 surfaced on the basis of the statement of one of the arrested person and over and above this, there is no material against him. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 20.06.2015.

Considering the submission as above, this application is allowed. The petitioner, abovenamed, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ara, in connection with Ara G.R.P. Case No.12 of 2015.

This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required, and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court, on two consecutive occasions, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.

This is subject to further condition that if the petitioner is made accused in similar nature of case or found indulging in such activities, the prosecution will be at liberty to approach this Court for cancellation of the bail, granted to him by virtue of this present order. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Praveen-II/- U T