← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1872/2021disposed

Sunaina Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-05Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1872 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21777 of 2018 ====================================================== Sunaina Devi W/o Late Sushil Ray Resident of Village- Galimapur, P.O.- Masharakh, P.S.- Taraiya, Distt- Chhapra (Saran). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Senthil K. Kumar, The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Smt. Poonam, The Commissioner, Saran at Chapra. 4.

Smt. Poonam, The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra. 5.

Shri Baldeo Chaudhary Deore, The Senior Deputy Collector, (General) Saran at Chapra.

6.

Shri Yogendra Kumar, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Madaura, Saran at Chapra.

7.

Miss Anku Gupta, The Circle Officer, Taraiya, Saran at Chapra. 8.

Shri Krishna Kumar Singh, 1 The Block Development Officer, Taraiya, Saran at Chapra.

9.

Shri Ramawatar Sharma, The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Binode Bariar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Manish Kumar, GP-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 05-05-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 04.03.2021

Patna High Court MJC No.1872 of 2021(3) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 passed in CWJC No. 21777 of 2018."

3. A show cause has been filed by the opposite party and learned State counsel Mr. Manish Kumar has taken this Court to the memo no. 828 dated 01.09.2023 to show that the claim of the petitioner has been rejected.

4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U