Ram Uday Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12945 of 2022 ====================================================== Ram Uday Singh Son of Shyam Sunder Singh, Resident of Village - Paharpur, Ward No. 2, P.S. - Barhiya, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Land and Revenue Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Collector, Lakhisarai.

3.

The Additional Collector, Lakhisarai.

4.

The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Lakhisarai. 5.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

6.

The Anchal Adhikari, Barhiya, Lakhisarai.

7.

Subodh Kumar, Son of Late Krishnandan Singh, Resident of Village - Paharpur, P.S. - Barhiya, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hansraj, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam ( Aag 12 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief:

(i) For quashing the order dated 03/07.07.2022 passed by learned Member of Bihar Land Tribunal in B.L.T. Case No.121/2022, whereby and where under Jamabandi created in favour of the petitioner has been cancelled.

(ii) For quashing the order dated 20.03.2021 passed by learned Addl. Collector,

Patna High Court CWJC No. 12945 of 2022(12) dt.23-07-2026 2/2 Lakhisarai in Jamabandi Cancellation No.27/2019, whereby and where under Jamabandi created in favour of the petitioner has been cancelled.

(iii) For any other relief/reliefs for which petitioner is entitled under law as well as on facts.

3. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there has been a gross error observed in the order of Additional Collector and mutation has wrongly been created in favour of Private respondent No. 7.

4. The Learned counsel for the State submits that there is an alternative remedy available to the petitioner and learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the proposition that there is a statutory appeal available to the petitioner.

5. " In light of these observations, the present writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned authority/court.

(Alok Kumar, J) Anand/- U