Subhash Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6361 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2015 Thana -CHANDRADEEP District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Subhash Yadav son of Sri Ganesh Yadav

2. Vikash Yadav son of Sri Ganesh Yadav All resident of VillageDharmpur, P.S.- Chandradeep, District- Jamui. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Mahto, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 11-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 341, 307, 448, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Chandradeep P.S. Case No. 80 of 2015.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute between the parties and for which co-accused Ganesh Yadav had instituted a Complaint Case No. 609C/2012 (Annexure-4).

4. Learned APP on the basis of case diary and assisted by learned counsel appearing suo motu on behalf o the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6361 of 2016 (3) dt.11-04-2016 informant opposes the anticipatory bail petition.

5. Considering that several persons have been injured in the scuffle and one of the injuries on Mangli Yadav is grievous in nature with the result of assault committed by the accused persons, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Bail petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U T