← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49888/2022bail granted

Pawan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-13Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49888 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2022 Thana- MALAYPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== Pawan Kumar Son Of Arun Ravidas R/O Village- Dewachak, P.S.- Malaypur, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 324, 379 of the Indian Penal Code Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with accused persons surrounded the informant having armed with lathi, iron rod etc. and assaulted the informant due to which he received injury. It is further alleged that an amount of Rs. 20,000/- was also taken away by Tinku Kumar and Pramod Das from the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49888 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedents and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner and no specific allegation of any assault or overt act against the petitioner. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused person namely Kundan Kumar and Ajay Kumar have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 06.12.2022 in Cr. Misc. No. 48143 of 2022 and the case of the petitioner stands on similar footing.

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Malaypur P.S. Case No. 60 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49888 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 3/3 Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T